The Culture Fair Intelligence Test (CFIT) was conceived by Raymond B. Cattell in 1920s. It is a nonverbal instrument to measure your analytical and reasoning ability in the abstract and novel situations. The test includes mazes, classifications, conditions and series. Such problems are believed to be common with all cultures. That’s the reason that the testing industry claims it free from all cultural influences.
The culture fair is a high speed IQ test. The full scale is to be resolved in less than one hour. When you ignore the speed factor, your results can be misleading and even dangerous to your career efforts.
The culture fair intelligence test has gone through many revisions since its inception. The latest revision was made in 1961 and since then very smart and minor changes have been introduced. Currently you can find three scales of the culture fair IQ test.
The first scale of the culture fair test is used for children (4-8 years) and the people of mental retardation. This scale is not important for your career building efforts.
However, the scale number 2 and 3 are used for screening purposes at job and college admission situations. So, the remaining part of this page shall focus upon the common features of these two scales of the culture fair tests.
The scale 2 and 3 contain two equivalent forms as A and B with the following features.
• Each form can be administered individually or with combination of the other form. When it is administered individually, it is called short intelligence test. However, when the both forms of a scale are combined, it is called a full scale test.
• Each form is comprised of four sub-tests: series, classifications, matrices and conditions. Each sub-test is preceded by several practice questions. You are offered a booklet of eight-pages of multiple choice questionnaires.
The testing and retesting of the scales 2 and 3 in the alternative forms have proven that the culture fair IQ test is consistently reliable. Dozens of the studies prove that full culture fair IQ test is reliable up to .80s.
The validity of the culture test has also been established. Its scores correlate in mid .80 with the general factor of intelligence and show consistently strong relationship with other mainstream intelligence tests such as WAIS, WISC, Raven Progressive Matrices, Stanford-Binet, Otis and General Aptitude Test Battery.
The developers of the culture fair test took considerably large samples of the population to standardize the results.
The standardized group for the scale 2 was comprised of 4328 people including males and females. The developers included population not only from various regions of the United States but also from the Great Britain.
The standardized group for the scale 3 of the culture fair intelligence test was comprised of 3140 people. This sample included students from the American High Schools and young adults from all over the America.
However, critics reject the standardization of the culture fair intelligence test on solid grounds. They rightly claim that the sample was not fully representative. The standardization process has not even described percentages of women, African American, Americans and other sections of the population. Thus the whole process of standardization is faulty and misleading.
We find value in differences between learning, interpreting and overall opinions. Please share your thoughts freely about this topic, but always remain respectful. Thank you for your contribution.