A Pseudo Science. Why Stop Here?

by Anonymous

Why stop at this cocktail party pseudo science? Is this real psychology? Handwriting analysis is big in France, lets employ more of it. Maybe more body language analysis. How about aura reading? Primary school IQ tests anybody?


Employing these measures is just a return to the 1970's when most of this junk science was initially debunked. Many Human Resource professionals (it's a profession?) grow increasingly enamored of such tools in times of economic downturn, when they can rub their hands together in glee that "recruiting and retention," challenges are a thing of the past.

Personnel managers with a new title, drunk with power, playing with junk science they aren't able to understand.

Such testing is supposed to be a relative measure, not an absolute measure, yet they are typically only administered to select employees only according to the slant prescribed by personnel manager.

It is all rubbish!

Comments for A Pseudo Science. Why Stop Here?

Average Rating starstarstarstarstar

Click here to add your own comments

Rating
starstarstarstarstar 		A Pseudo Science
by: Anonymous

Really impressive post. I read it whole and going to share it with my social circules. I enjoyed your article and planning to rewrite it on my own blog.
Best Cars For Teen
Rating
starstarstarstarstar 		Reply
by: Anonymous

I am not much aware about pseudo science. Here you have told that primary school IQ test is a relative measure and not an absolute measure. Then why all the schools are testing the IQ. I don’t understand the importance.
Rating
starstarstarstar 		Couldn't Agree More
by: Anonymous

I am a human resource professional with a degree in psychology and one in education. This means I have studied and understand testing. Having taken (and "failed") the Caliper twice, I can attest to the fact it is junk science at its worst. If you read their site carefully, you will find that the test is reliable, but has NEVER been validated in a double blind study of any nature. That is to say people tend to answer the test the same way on repeat takes (reliable). No one has determined if the results of the test actually result in picking the best candidate by measuring what they claim to measure(validity).

The problem is that they rely strictly on anecdotal evidence to support validity. In order to determine if the test results actually predict success, you would have to do a very elegant study where random results were compared with actual ones and you would need a consistent measure for job success. The problem is that the decisions to use and rely on tests like this are made by people with business degrees or policy makers. They like quick, easily countable answers and since most human resource types are now part of the business world, you can see why the things proliferate.

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to views.

Recent Articles

RSS

  1. Too critical.

    Jun 25, 19 06:01 AM

    I discovered what type I am, and as I read deeper into that type, it told me things about myself.. This article was far too critical. My health practitioner

    Read More

  2. What?!

    Apr 02, 19 01:31 PM

    No way are loads of you getting 160+. Einstein's was 160 and mine is 145. Did you all do your tests on the same website? If so it must be REALLY inaccurate

    Read More

  3. Wrong Reply!

    Apr 02, 19 01:24 PM

    Question 7: If a cube has all sizes of equal size, and you have a block that has a side that is 20cm long then the smallest cube that you make has to

    Read More