Fun little pastime, nothing more

by Jay
(Spain)


That some people would ascribe so much value to this incredibly pseudo-scientific model is concerning. It is just one more system attempting to classify humans into overly simplistic categories of Horoscopic descriptions - incredibly generalised, enough to "fit" anyone, with just enough detail to seem like they could be legitimately truthful and helpful to you as an individual person.


The Myers-Briggs personality test is flawed enough, but it has *just* enough scientific grounding to be somewhat valid. This, though? This is about as constructively useful as blowing smoke up your arse - a fun experiment, if taken the right way, but more likely than not a colossal waste of time with potentially negative side effects.

I've noticed that when we attempt to define ourselves with limiting labels, no matter the kind, we tend to limit subconsciously ourselves psychologically, rather than attempt to grow beyond those labels.

Click here to post comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to Personality-Test.

Recent Articles

  1. I Don't Know What to Put Here?

    Feb 23, 18 03:24 PM

    OK, I am a 13-year-old caucasian male who took a Mensa test and got 186 IQ, based on this website it says I amHigh Genius but currently only have a 2.5

    Read More

  2. IQ Rating Scale and Categories of Genius and Feeble-minded People

    Feb 19, 18 03:12 PM

    Conventional IQ Rating Scale starts at 10 and may go above 200 IQ scores. Your results depends upon your replies, nature, nurture, and quality of the IQ test. Let's explore

    Read More

  3. A brief history of IQ Tests

    Feb 18, 18 02:25 PM

    History of IQ tests goes back when the first man was hired for a job. However, Binet Simon Scale led the path for other tools. It is also one of the War War-I positive externalities.

    Read More