Fun little pastime, nothing more

by Jay
(Spain)


That some people would ascribe so much value to this incredibly pseudo-scientific model is concerning. It is just one more system attempting to classify humans into overly simplistic categories of Horoscopic descriptions - incredibly generalised, enough to "fit" anyone, with just enough detail to seem like they could be legitimately truthful and helpful to you as an individual person.


The Myers-Briggs personality test is flawed enough, but it has *just* enough scientific grounding to be somewhat valid. This, though? This is about as constructively useful as blowing smoke up your arse - a fun experiment, if taken the right way, but more likely than not a colossal waste of time with potentially negative side effects.

I've noticed that when we attempt to define ourselves with limiting labels, no matter the kind, we tend to limit subconsciously ourselves psychologically, rather than attempt to grow beyond those labels.

Click here to post comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to Personality-Test.

Recent Articles

  1. IQ test biases and response from the other side

    Nov 16, 17 02:25 PM

    Some IQ test biases are strong despite huge improvement in the testing industry. Yet we need to take their results for average lot with a grain of salt.

    Read More

  2. Wonderlic Test is Language Biased

    Nov 16, 17 08:20 AM

    The test is language-biased. If I had native English or A+ vocabulary, I would've scored higher.

    Read More

  3. Minnesota Personality Test

    Nov 12, 17 02:56 AM

    The Minnesota Personality Test is used to measure mental illness and lies. However, only a psychologist can interpret the results correctly.

    Read More