Fun little pastime, nothing more

by Jay
(Spain)


That some people would ascribe so much value to this incredibly pseudo-scientific model is concerning. It is just one more system attempting to classify humans into overly simplistic categories of Horoscopic descriptions - incredibly generalised, enough to "fit" anyone, with just enough detail to seem like they could be legitimately truthful and helpful to you as an individual person.


The Myers-Briggs personality test is flawed enough, but it has *just* enough scientific grounding to be somewhat valid. This, though? This is about as constructively useful as blowing smoke up your arse - a fun experiment, if taken the right way, but more likely than not a colossal waste of time with potentially negative side effects.

I've noticed that when we attempt to define ourselves with limiting labels, no matter the kind, we tend to limit subconsciously ourselves psychologically, rather than attempt to grow beyond those labels.

Click here to post comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to Personality-Test.

Recent Articles

  1. Im Apparently 125 and Higher

    Jan 11, 19 02:16 PM

    Im a 15 year old in high school and I took a test that said I had an IQ of 125 or higher meaning university level, But in high school im failing all most

    Read More

  2. Emotional Intelligence in Business Shines!

    Jan 07, 19 02:17 PM

    When your employer is looking for a workforce with emotional intelligence in business, you need to understand what is included in the emotional intelligence?

    Read More

  3. Evolution Continued

    Jan 07, 19 01:39 PM

    Descendants of early humans more or less continue with the same level of intelligence because nature did not drive change. Those who were subjected to

    Read More